The joint investigation report on the first ever police super-complaint was published last month by the College of Policing, the HMICFRS and the IOPC. The investigation gives an insight into how information about migrant victims and witnesses of crime is reported to immigration authorities following an interaction with the police, and its consequences for victims’ outcomes and trust in law enforcement.
Here, we outline some of the learnings and recommendations from the findings that seek to improve law enforcement’s engagement with migrants. These are helpful when looking to improve police (and wider enforcement) engagement with migrants who have experienced labour exploitation.
Super-complaints aim to investigate local, regional and national patterns or trends in policing which are, or appear to be, significantly harming the public’s interest.
It sought an investigation into two police practices:
The super-complaint argued that these practices stop victims with insecure immigration status from engaging with the police due to fear of immigration enforcement action being taken against them. This situation results in migrant victims being denied access to justice, and offenders going unpunished and remaining free to abuse others, creating a significant threat to public safety.
While most of the evidence focused on the experiences of victims of domestic abuse, it acknowledged the harmful effect of these practices on all migrant victims of crime, including modern slavery and human trafficking.
Indeed, FLEX/LEAG’s recent publication illustrated how victims were deterred from reporting labour exploitation for fear that law enforcement would prioritise immigration control. These fears are strengthened when a migrant has a negative experience with the police, creating a knock-on effect that stops other victims from reporting.
The Home Office has used data shared by the police against migrant victims. The report confirms that this has happened on multiple occasions and that many police officers were unaware of this practice.
The purpose of reporting migrant victims to the Home Office immigration enforcement team is unclear. The investigation found that in many cases it was not clear why the police share victims’ data with the Home Office, nor how the Home Office plans to use the information. Investigators concluded there is no evidence that police sharing this data with immigration authorities helps to safeguard victims.
Existing guidance and training, including the NPCC guidance, does not help police officers balance criminal justice and victim safety priorities against the government’s immigration enforcement priorities. Frontline officers are not trained on how to support victims and witnesses with insecure status, despite receiving training on safeguarding and vulnerability. The investigation also found that the majority of police forces have not established policies or guidance on engaging and safeguarding migrant victims in spite of having the power to set and publish local policies. Lack of appropriate guidance and training is leading to inconsistent responses and leaves police unprepared to support migrant victims.
Despite not intentionally seeking to prioritise immigration enforcement, there is clear evidence that police sometimes do, which contributes to a perception that the police give more weight to immigration issues than to investigating crime and safeguarding victims. Abusers use this perception to threaten migrant victims with reporting to the police, which further perpetuates an image of the police as a threat rather than a source of protection.
Inspectors highlighted that the police were not doing enough to address these risks, including, for example, by engaging with local migrant groups to build trust in reporting to the police.
Significant harm is being caused to the public interest since crime is going unreported, migrant victims are unable to access justice and perpetrators remain free to victimise others. Investigators concluded that neither the police nor the Home Office are able to assure communities that everyone will be treated fairly and safely.
The investigation recommends police work to ensure all migrant victims and witnesses of crime are effectively supported though secure reporting pathways to the police and other statutory agencies. More specifically it recommends that:
These recommendations provide a starting point in improving the police’s engagement and support of migrant victims and witnesses with insecure status. They are aligned with the approach taken by police forces abroad who have successfully strengthened trust with migrant communities and increased reporting of crimes following the establishment of secure reporting. We look forward to supporting the police and Home Office in adopting these recommendations and to create safer pathways to reporting and justice for migrant victims of labour exploitation.
You can find more information on international strategies to establish secure reporting systems here.